|
Waste Diversion Ontario subcommittee comprising municipal and industry representatives recently committed millions of dollars to an initiative that will view the province as a series of "waste-shed" regions to be serviced, as opposed to dozens of individual programs looking to become more efficient. It's all part of a new strategy the committee confirmed back in July 2011. While still operating under the rubric of continuous improvement, the new funding focus clearly anticipates a world where Ontario's recycling programs will be under industry, not municipal, control. It could well be that those who agreed to this change of priority for funds know something we don't. These funds are, after all, part of the stewards' share of municipal recycling costs. Perhaps the minutes from future WDO board meetings will provide some insight, although we've seen nothing posted to date. The first and very welcome issue of the MIPC Minute, released in the fall, did note that the change "will set the basis for the implementation of full Extended Producer Responsibility". This was before the election, even as one of the parties, Mr. Hudak's Progressive Conservatives, was talking quite loudly about "reviewing" all the provincial programs. Either way, a request for proposals for the optimization/regionalization study was prepared. It actually hit the street a few days after the election and was awarded just before Christmas to StewardEdge (formerly Corporations Supporting Recycling), and some U.S. partners. Had the election result been different, one wonders if the RFP would still have gone out. But it did go out and work is already well under way, with a report anticipated in the spring. It's a big project. In all, up to $8 million of the 2011 Continuous Improvement Fund budget and 50% of the 2012 dollars have been set aside for optimization work (which means regionalization). That's a lot of municipal dollars (in effect), so confirmation that the EPR will move ahead cannot come soon enough
|
|