|
old "the consumer and the taxpayer are the same person" line. This, of course, is garbage. Perhaps the cost of gasoline should be on the local taxpayer, too. Or how about potato chips? The markets for recyclables, like any commodities, are up and down. When they are particularly bad, and thus when the taxpayers are paying even more to support the consumer society, the soft drink industry has often stepped forward with a gesture. The pop guys were major contributors to the blue box program in the old OMMRI days. There have always been resources made available for promotional efforts, usually through an industry organization. Six years ago, the soft drink industry made a dramatic move, switching from steel to aluminum cans. The makers of pop have claimed to be paying their way in Ontario's recycling program, with some reason - until now. Now we have the Waste Diversion Organization, with a declared goal to split the net recycling cost 50/50 with industry. This is a long way from the full product stewardship called for by AMO a few years ago. The aluminum can has been the only consistent piece of good news in the recycling revenue department, and the pop industry always reminds everyone that it is carrying the other players in the blue box. One of those players now is the PET pop bottle. At some point, one of two things will happen. The makers of pop will ask themselves how long they want to carry the other guys, or the increasing use of PET for soft drinks will mean the pop containers themselves become passengers in the blue box and municipal taxpayers will continue to carry the can. Either way, the ghost of deposit-return will be back, and maybe someone out there will be listening, next time.
|
|